Citation information for individual datasets is often provided in the metadata. However, not all datasets have this information embedded in the discovery metadata. On a general basis a citation of a dataset include the same components as any other citation:
author,
title,
year of publication,
publisher (for data this is often the archive where it is housed),
edition or version,
access information (a URL or persistent identifier, e.g. DOI if provided)
The information required to properly cite a dataset is normally provided in the discovery metadata the datasets.
If you use data retrieved through this portal, please acknowledge the SAON Data Portal.
Brief user guide
The Data Access Portal has information in 3 columns. An outline of the content in these columns is provided above. When first entering the search interface, all potential datasets are listed. Datasets are indicated in the map and results tabulation elements which are located in the middle column. The order of results can be modified using the "Sort by" option in the left column. On top of this column is normally relevant guidance information to user presented as collapsible elements.
If the user want to refine the search, this can be done by constraining the bounding box search. This is done in the map - the listing of datasets is automatically updated. Date constraints can be added in the left column. For these to take effect, the user has to push the button marked search. In the left column it is also possible to specific text elements to search for in the datasets. Again pushing the button marked "Search" is necessary for these to take action. Complex search patterns can be constructed using logical operators through the drop down menu above the text field. Text strings that are not quoted are treated as separate words and will match any of the words (i.e. assuming the OR operator). Phrases may be prefixed with '-' to indicate no occurence of the phrase in the results.
Other elements indicated in the left and right columns are facet searches, i.e. these are keywords that are found in the datasets and all datasets that contain these specific keywords in the appropriate metadata elements are listed together. Further refinement can be done using full text, date or bounding box constraints. Individuals, organisations and data centres involved in generating or curating the datasets are listed in the facets in the right column.
Data products generated by the Ocean Colour component of the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative project. These files are daily composites of merged sensor (MERIS, MODIS Aqua, SeaWiFS LAC & GAC, VIIRS, OLCI) products. MODIS Aqua and SeaWiFS were band-shifted and bias-corrected to MERIS bands and values using a temporally and spatially varying scheme based on the overlap years of 2003-2007. VIIRS was band-shifted and bias-corrected in a second stage against the MODIS Rrs that had already been corrected to MERIS levels, for the overlap period 2012-2013; and at the third stage OLCI was bias corrected against already corrected MODIS, for overlap period 2016-07-01 to 2019-06-30. VIIRS, MODIS, SeaWiFS and MERIS Rrs were derived from a combination of NASA/s l2gen (for basic sensor geometry corrections, etc) and HYGEOS Polymer v4.12 (for atmospheric correction). OLCI Rrs were sourced at L1b (already geometrically corrected) and processed with polymer. The Rrs were binned to a sinusoidal 1km level-3 grid, and later to 1km geographic projection, by Brockmann Consult/s SNAP. Derived products were generally computed with the standard algorithmsthrough SeaDAS. QAA IOPs were derived using the standard SeaDAS algorithm but with a modified backscattering table to match that used in the bandshifting. The final chlorophyll is a combination of OCI, OCI2, OC2 and OCx, depending on the water class memberships. Uncertainty estimates were added using the fuzzy water classifier and uncertainty estimation algorithm of Tim Moore as documented in Jackson et al (2017). and updated accorsing to Jackson et al. (in prep).
Institutions: UNIS, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Norwegian Meteorological Institute / Arctic Data Centre
Last metadata update: 2023-02-28T13:00:00Z
Show more...
Abstract:
Wave observations from a buoy located in Isfjorden at Svalbard. This dataset contains several sub datasets representing different variables and time periods.
Centre for Sustainable Arctic Marine and Coastal Technology, Arctic Offshore and Coastal Engineering in a Changing Climate, Programme for International Partnerships for Excellent Education, Research, and Innovation, Dynamics of Floating Ice, Large-scale Programme for Petroleum Research, Survey to assess harp and hooded seal pup production in the Greenland sea pack-ice in 2018, Integrated System for Operations in Polar Seas, Nansen Legacy, Dynamics of Floating ice, Australian Antarctic Program projects 4593 and 4506, Joyce Lambert Antarctic Research Fund grant no. 604086, Research Council of Norway grant no. 280625, Fram 2020, Arctic Challenge for Sustainability II, JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP 19H00801, 19H05512, 21K14357 and 22H00241, Survey to assess harp and hooded seal pup production in the Greenland sea pack-ice in 2022, SURVEYS TO ASSESS HARP AND HOODED SEAL PUP PRODUCTION IN THE GREENLAND SEA PACK-ICE IN 2022 (SAMCoT, AOCEC, INTPART, DOFI, PTEROMAKS2, ISOPS, AeN, ArCS II)
Institutions: Norwegian Meteorological Institute (MET), University of Melbourne, College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Tokyo, Havforskningsinstituttet, Norwegian Meteorological Institute / Arctic Data Centre
Sea ice drift trajectories and waves in sea ice data collected over the period 2017-2022 by a consortium of researchers, both in the Arctic and the Antarctic.
As part of the "KROP - Kongsfjorden Rijpfjorden Observatory Programme" UiT The Arctic University of Norway and The Scottish Association for Marine Science maintain marine observatories (moorings) in two high-Arctic fjords in Svalbard: Kongsfjorden and Rijpfjorden. The observatories consists of an array of CTDs, temperature loggers, ADCPs and a sediment trap, in addition to various other instruments or installations that change from year to year. This dataset contains the CTD, PAR and fluorescence data from Kongsfjorden 2016-2017. Fluorescence data is given as raw voltage only, due to calibration and fouling issues. It is meant as an indication of the timing of the phytoplankton bloom, not as absolute chlorophyll a concentration. No post-recovery processing of light data (to correct for fouling) has been performed. The observatory layout is available in the mooring diagram provided. At this deployment, two settlement plates were deployed (25m and 208m).
As part of the "KROP - Kongsfjorden Rijpfjorden Observatory Programme" UiT The Arctic University of Norway and The Scottish Association for Marine Science maintain marine observatories (moorings) in two high-Arctic fjords in Svalbard: Kongsfjorden and Rijpfjorden. The observatories consists of an array of CTDs, temperature loggers, ADCPs and a sediment trap, in addition to various other instruments or installations that change from year to year. This dataset contains the CTD, PAR and fluorescence data from Kongsfjorden 2017-2018. Fluorescence data is given as raw voltage only, due to calibration and fouling issues. It is meant as an indication of the timing of the phytoplankton bloom, not as absolute chlorophyll a concentration. No post-recovery processing of light data (to correct for fouling) has been performed. The observatory layout is available in the mooring diagram provided.
As part of the "KROP - Kongsfjorden Rijpfjorden Observatory Programme" UiT The Arctic University of Norway and The Scottish Association for Marine Science maintain marine observatories (moorings) in two high-Arctic fjords in Svalbard: Kongsfjorden and Rijpfjorden. The observatories consists of an array of CTDs, temperature loggers, ADCPs and a sediment trap, in addition to various other instruments or installations that change from year to year. This dataset contains the CTD, PAR and fluorescence data from Kongsfjorden 2014-2015. Fluorescence data is given as raw voltage only, due to calibration and fouling issues. It is meant as an indication of the timing of the phytoplankton bloom, not as absolute chlorophyll a concentration. No post-recovery processing of light data (to correct for fouling) has been performed. Together with the top and bottom SBE37 two plastic settlement plates had been deployed for a settlement experiment for the recruitment of benthic invertebrates. The sediment trap was mounted at 47m instead the usual depth of 100 m because of specific requirements for the experiment. The observatory layout is available in the mooring diagram provided. References: Meyer et al 2017: Recruitment of benthic invertebrates in high Arctic fjords: Relation to temperature, depth, and season. LINK. Weydmann-Zwolicka et al 2021: Zooplankton and sediment fluxes in two contrasting fjords reveal Atlantification of the Arctic. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145599
As part of the "KROP - Kongsfjorden Rijpfjorden Observatory Programme" UiT The Arctic University of Norway and The Scottish Association for Marine Science maintain marine observatories (moorings) in two high-Arctic fjords in Svalbard: Kongsfjorden and Rijpfjorden. The observatories consists of an array of CTDs, temperature loggers, ADCPs and a sediment trap, in addition to various other instruments or installations that change from year to year. This dataset contains the CTD, PAR and fluorescence data from Kongsfjorden 2013-2014. Fluorescence data is given as raw voltage only, due to calibration and fouling issues. It is meant as an indication of the timing of the phytoplankton bloom, not as absolute chlorophyll a concentration. No post-recovery processing of light data (to correct for fouling) has been performed. This is the first deployment in which the AURAL acoustic listening buoy got implemented in the design.
As part of the "KROP - Kongsfjorden Rijpfjorden Observatory Programme" UiT The Arctic University of Norway and The Scottish Association for Marine Science maintain marine observatories (moorings) in two high-Arctic fjords in Svalbard: Kongsfjorden and Rijpfjorden. The observatories consists of an array of CTDs, temperature loggers, ADCPs and a sediment trap, in addition to various other instruments or installations that change from year to year. This dataset contains the CTD, PAR and fluorescence data from Kongsfjorden 2012-2013. Fluorescence data is given as raw voltage only, due to calibration and fouling issues. It is meant as an indication of the timing of the phytoplankton bloom, not as absolute chlorophyll a concentration. No post-recovery processing of light data (to correct for fouling) has been performed. The setup on for this deployment had several differences from other years. This is the last deployment using Vemco miniloggers for temperature (later: SBE56). An additional SBE16+ was placed above the top sphere on a rope with an additional float (26 m). There was also an additional sediment trap at 56 m. The standard setup of an upward and downward looking ADCP above and below the 112 m sediment trap was established and continued ever since.
As part of the "KROP - Kongsfjorden Rijpfjorden Observatory Programme" UiT The Arctic University of Norway and The Scottish Association for Marine Science maintain marine observatories (moorings) in two high-Arctic fjords in Svalbard: Kongsfjorden and Rijpfjorden. The observatories consists of an array of CTDs, temperature loggers, ADCPs and a sediment trap, in addition to various other instruments or installations that change from year to year. This dataset contains the CTD, PAR and fluorescence data from Kongsfjorden 2015-2016. Fluorescence data is given as raw voltage only, due to calibration and fouling issues. It is meant as an indication of the timing of the phytoplankton bloom, not as absolute chlorophyll a concentration. No post-recovery processing of light data (to correct for fouling) has been performed. The observatory layout is available in the mooring diagram provided. For this deployment a RAS500 water sampler and a SUNA nitrate sensor were deployed for a specific project, data are not part of the long-term monitoring efforts and are available upon request.
Geophone and Hydrophone deployments in Svalbard 2022, to measure the vibrations in sea ice following the appearance of cracks. For more information, see https://github.com/jvoermans/Geophone_Logger .
This ocean model is operated at 20km resolution covering the Nordic Seas
and the Arctic Ocean. This specific dataset provides the daily analysis
from the operational model. Only the analysis is provided for historical
periods, the daily forecast with 1 hour resolution is provided as a
separate dataset. Currently the WMS presentation of this dataset is not
supporting the 3D nature.
A numerical model is applied to describe the dynamics of the oceans, such
as sea level variations (tides and storm surge), movements in the water
column (currents) and the salinity and temperature. To simulate the ocean,
a 3-D grid is applied with different sizes, i.e., small grids for fine
scale or detailed calculations, and larger or coarser grids to cover
larger areas (and depth). The model runs on a supercomputer, and provides
forecasts of sea level, currents, salinity and temperature for a
time-range between 66 (2.75 days) and 240 hours (10 days). The model is
run operationally, i.e, in a "24/7/365" environment to provide a 99.5%
stability on a yearly basis. Currents from the model is further applied in
emergency-models that simulates pathways of oil slicks and drifting
objects (Search And Rescue).
The ocean model used is the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS). This is
a three-dimensional, free-surface, terrain-following numerical model that
solve the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations using the hydrostatic
and Boussinesq assumptions (Haidvogel et al., 2008).
Haidvogel, D. B., H. Arango, W. P. Budgell, B. D. Cornuelle, E.
Curchitser, E. Di Lorenzo, K. Fennel, W. R. Geyer, A. J. Hermann, L.
Lanerolle, J. Levin, J. C. McWilliams, A. J. Miller, A. M. Moore, T. M.
Powell, A. F. Shchepetkin, C. R. Sherwood, R. P. Signell, J. C. Warner,
and J. Wilkin, Ocean forecasting in terrain-following coordinates:
Formulation and skill assessment of the Regional Ocean Modeling System,
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 227, 3595–3624, 2008.
THIS MODEL IS DISCONTINUED AND NO FORECAST DATA IS AVAILABLE ONLINE.
This ocean model is operated at 20km resolution covering the Nordic Seas
and the Arctic Ocean. This specific dataset provides the hourly forecast
fields from the operational model. For historical purposes, the daily
analysis is provided as another dataset. If for some reason the
historical forecast is required, pleased use the contact information
provided to receive this (manual task).
A numerical model is applied to describe the dynamics of the oceans, such
as sea level variations (tides and storm surge), movements in the water
column (currents) and the salinity and temperature. To simulate the ocean,
a 3-D grid is applied with different sizes, i.e., small grids for fine
scale or detailed calculations, and larger or coarser grids to cover
larger areas (and depth). The model runs on a supercomputer, and provides
forecasts of sea level, currents, salinity and temperature for a
time-range between 66 (2.75 days) and 240 hours (10 days). The model is
run operationally, i.e, in a "24/7/365" environment to provide a 99.5%
stability on a yearly basis. Currents from the model is further applied in
emergency-models that simulates pathways of oil slicks and drifting
objects (Search And Rescue).
The ocean model used is the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS). This is
a three-dimensional, free-surface, terrain-following numerical model that
solve the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations using the hydrostatic
and Boussinesq assumptions (Haidvogel et al., 2008).
Haidvogel, D. B., H. Arango, W. P. Budgell, B. D. Cornuelle, E.
Curchitser, E. Di Lorenzo, K. Fennel, W. R. Geyer, A. J. Hermann, L.
Lanerolle, J. Levin, J. C. McWilliams, A. J. Miller, A. M. Moore, T. M.
Powell, A. F. Shchepetkin, C. R. Sherwood, R. P. Signell, J. C. Warner,
and J. Wilkin, Ocean forecasting in terrain-following coordinates:
Formulation and skill assessment of the Regional Ocean Modeling System,
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 227, 3595–3624, 2008.
Geosystem monitoring at the Polish Polar Station Hornsund
Institutions: Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences
Last metadata update: 2022-04-29T13:30:00Z
Show more...
Abstract:
In-house developed time-lapse cameras are installed along the coast of Isbjornhamna, on Ariekammen slopes and in front of the Hansbreen. Imagery is mainly used for calving observations, icebergs tracking and sea ice concentration monitoring. Only raw imagery is avilable.
Institutions: UiT The Arctic University of Norway, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norwegain Infrastructure for Research Data (NIRD)
This dataset includes taxonomy and daily vertical export rates of planktonic protist cells, planktonic protist carbon (PPC), and zooplankton abundance and biomass fluxes. Samples were collected from long-term sediment traps deployed on moorings north and northeast of Svalbard from October 2017 to October 2018, as part of the Nansen Legacy (UiT, NO) and Arctic PRIZE (SAMS, UK).
This dataset includes observations of benthic organisms from Isfjorden, Billefjorden, Kongsfjorden, Magdalenafjorden and the marginal ice zone (MIZ). The organisms were collected using benthic trawls. The trawls were done in April 2023, during a field trip on F/F Helmer Hanssen for students in the AB202 course at UNIS. The benthos were described to the lowest possible taxonomic level by the students.