Citation information for individual datasets is often provided in the metadata. However, not all datasets have this information embedded in the discovery metadata. On a general basis a citation of a dataset include the same components as any other citation:
author,
title,
year of publication,
publisher (for data this is often the archive where it is housed),
edition or version,
access information (a URL or persistent identifier, e.g. DOI if provided)
The information required to properly cite a dataset is normally provided in the discovery metadata the datasets.
If you use data retrieved through this portal, please acknowledge the SAON Data Portal.
Brief user guide
The Data Access Portal has information in 3 columns. An outline of the content in these columns is provided above. When first entering the search interface, all potential datasets are listed. Datasets are indicated in the map and results tabulation elements which are located in the middle column. The order of results can be modified using the "Sort by" option in the left column. On top of this column is normally relevant guidance information to user presented as collapsible elements.
If the user want to refine the search, this can be done by constraining the bounding box search. This is done in the map - the listing of datasets is automatically updated. Date constraints can be added in the left column. For these to take effect, the user has to push the button marked search. In the left column it is also possible to specific text elements to search for in the datasets. Again pushing the button marked "Search" is necessary for these to take action. Complex search patterns can be constructed using logical operators through the drop down menu above the text field. Text strings that are not quoted are treated as separate words and will match any of the words (i.e. assuming the OR operator). Phrases may be prefixed with '-' to indicate no occurence of the phrase in the results.
Other elements indicated in the left and right columns are facet searches, i.e. these are keywords that are found in the datasets and all datasets that contain these specific keywords in the appropriate metadata elements are listed together. Further refinement can be done using full text, date or bounding box constraints. Individuals, organisations and data centres involved in generating or curating the datasets are listed in the facets in the right column.
The Climate Change Tower Integrated Project (CCT-IP) represents the guide lines of the italian research in the arctic and aims to study the interaction between all the components of the climate system in the Arctic. The Amundsen-Nobile Climate Change Tower (CCT) is the key infrastructure of the project, and provides continuous acquisition of the atmospheric parameters at different heights as well as at the interface between the surface and the atmosphere.
Turbulent parameters are measured at the Amundsen-Nobile Climate Change Tower (CCT) by means of a Gill R3 sonic anemometer installed at 7.5 m from the ground since 2010. It measures the three components of the wind (u, v and w) and the sonic temperature at a rate of 20 Hz. These micro-meteorological measurements are complemented by standard meteorological ones at 4 levels: 2, 5, 10 and 33 m (acquisition time step equal to 1 minute). From these measurements, sensible heat flux, friction velocity and roughness length are calculated.
Wind components and sonic temperature measurements were used to estimate friction velocity and kinematic heat flux. Before computing the micrometeorological parameters, a preliminary analysis is applied in order to assess the data quality and to remove low quality records. After the quality analysis application, mean values of the turbulence statistics were computed following two coordinate rotations to ensure the mean lateral and vertical velocities were zero (McMillen, 1988). Half-hour turbulent statistics (heat fluxes and friction velocity) were derived using two time-scales: a standard averaging time of 30 min and a reduced one (2 min) necessary for filtering out submeso motions contributions that can greatly alter the estimation of turbulent fluxes in a strong and long-lived stable BL. The short averaging time scale was evaluated on the basis of spectral analysis of data in order to include all turbulent scales, but excluding submeso motions (larger than turbulence). The turbulent statistics evaluated over the short subsets and then re-averaged over 30 min following Vickers and Mahrt (2006).
Turbulent parameter relative to unfavorable wind direction ([150÷270] degrees) for which the tower was upwind of the sonic anemometer were not discarded but are flagged (flagdir=1) in the final dataset. More, the percentage of NaNs relative to each run is indicated.
The wind speed vertical profile measured by slow response standard meteorological anemometers at 2, 5, 10 and 33 m was used for estimating the roughness length assuming a typical log wind profile under statically neutral conditions.
Mahrt, L., 1998. Flux Sampling Errors for aircraft and towers. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 15, 416-429.
Mc Millen, R.T., 1988. An Eddy correlation technique with extended applicability to non-simple terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 43, 231-245.
Vickers D, Mahrt L. 2006. A solution for flux contamination by mesoscale motions with very weak turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 118: 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9003-y.
Zahn, E., Chor, T.L., Dias, N. L., 2016. A Simple Methodology for Quality Control of Micrometeorological Datasets. American Journal of Environmental Engineering 6(4A): 135-142 DOI: 10.5923/s.ajee.201601.20.