Citation information for individual datasets is often provided in the metadata. However, not all datasets have this information embedded in the discovery metadata. On a general basis a citation of a dataset include the same components as any other citation:
author,
title,
year of publication,
publisher (for data this is often the archive where it is housed),
edition or version,
access information (a URL or persistent identifier, e.g. DOI if provided)
The information required to properly cite a dataset is normally provided in the discovery metadata the datasets.
If you use data retrieved through this portal, please acknowledge the SAON Data Portal.
Brief user guide
The Data Access Portal has information in 3 columns. An outline of the content in these columns is provided above. When first entering the search interface, all potential datasets are listed. Datasets are indicated in the map and results tabulation elements which are located in the middle column. The order of results can be modified using the "Sort by" option in the left column. On top of this column is normally relevant guidance information to user presented as collapsible elements.
If the user want to refine the search, this can be done by constraining the bounding box search. This is done in the map - the listing of datasets is automatically updated. Date constraints can be added in the left column. For these to take effect, the user has to push the button marked search. In the left column it is also possible to specific text elements to search for in the datasets. Again pushing the button marked "Search" is necessary for these to take action. Complex search patterns can be constructed using logical operators through the drop down menu above the text field. Text strings that are not quoted are treated as separate words and will match any of the words (i.e. assuming the OR operator). Phrases may be prefixed with '-' to indicate no occurence of the phrase in the results.
Other elements indicated in the left and right columns are facet searches, i.e. these are keywords that are found in the datasets and all datasets that contain these specific keywords in the appropriate metadata elements are listed together. Further refinement can be done using full text, date or bounding box constraints. Individuals, organisations and data centres involved in generating or curating the datasets are listed in the facets in the right column.
The dataset is an improved, high resolution ice shelf freeboard, thickness and draught product for Ekström, Jelbart, Fimbul, Vigrid and Nivlisen ice shelves in Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. It is based on high resolution (8 m) digital elevation model (DEM) strips from WorldView stereo-satellite image pairs used to create the Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica (REMA) mosaic (Howat et al., 2019). The standard mosaic product suffers from artifacts where ice shelf features such as rifts, the surface expressions of basal channels or crevasses, and the calving front are discontinuous as a result of the advection of features with ice flow between the time of different image acquisitions. Here, NASA ITS_LIVE ice flow velocity mosaics (Gardner et al., 2018) and the ArcMap/Python Warp tool were used to shift DEM tiles up or down the glacier flow field to a common reference date (based on the austral summer maximal DEM coverage of the grounding zone), then corrected for elevation biases and tilts in the vertical dimension using the offsets to CryoSat-2 derived Point of Closest Approach elevations (Gray et al., 2015; 2017), before being mosaicked. WGS84 ellipsoidal heights were converted to freeboard using the EIGEN6C4 geoid (Förste et al., 2014) and an ocean Mean Dynamic Topography of -1.3 m (Andersen et al., 2015). Freeboard was converted to thickness and draught using the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium (density of ice 917 kg/m^3, density of seawater 1027.5 kg/m^3) and an upsampled Firn Air Content (FAC) field (Ligtenberg et al., 2011). FAC was limited to 50% of freeboard in some marginal areas and ice filled rifts to prevent physically unrealistic ice thicknesses, an artifact of the oversampling of the FAC field. In addition, some discontinuities of small-scale features may persist.
References:
Howat, I. M., Porter, C., Smith, B. E., Noh, M.-J., and Morin, P.: The Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 13, 665–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-665-2019, 2019.
Gardner, A. S., M. A. Fahnestock, and T. A. Scambos, [2020]: ITS_LIVE Regional Glacier and Ice Sheet Surface Velocities: Version 1. Data archived at National Snow and Ice Data Center; https://doi:10.5067/6II6VW8LLWJ7. 2019.
Gray, L., Burgess, D., Copland, L., Demuth, M. N., Dunse, T., Langley, K., and Schuler, T. V.: CryoSat-2 delivers monthly and inter-annual surface elevation change for Arctic ice caps, The Cryosphere, 9, 1895–1913, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1895-2015, 2015.
Gray, L., Burgess, D., Copland, L., Dunse, T., Langley, K., and Moholdt, G.: A revised calibration of the interferometric mode of the CryoSat-2 radar altimeter improves ice height and height change measurements in western Greenland, The Cryosphere, 11, 1041–1058, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1041-2017, 2017.
Förste, C., Bruinsma, S. L., Abrykosov, O., Lemoine, J.-M., Marty, J. C., Flechtner, F., Balmino, G., Barthelmes, F., Biancale, R.: EIGEN-6C4 The latest combined global gravity field model including GOCE data up to degree and order 2190 of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/icgem.2015.1, 2014.
Andersen, O., Knudsen, P., Stenseng, L.: The DTU13 MSS (Mean Sea Surface) and MDT (Mean Dynamic Topography) from 20 Years of Satellite Altimetry. In: Jin, S., Barzaghi, R. (eds) IGFS 2014. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 144. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_182, 2015
Ligtenberg, S. R. M., Helsen, M. M., and van den Broeke, M. R.: An improved semi-empirical model for the densification of Antarctic firn, The Cryosphere, 5, 809–819, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-809-2011, 2011.